Saturday, January 25, 2020

Rule of Law Across the World

Rule of Law Across the World Rule of law, in general, states that no one is above the law. Even if you are the highest ranking official in your country or you are at the bottom echelon of individuals the law will always be equal to all. (LexisNexis, 2014) New Zealand and Canada both incorporate the rule of law in their respective government which is good because it is important that the people, whether rich or poor, can gain equal rights to laws especially in health care since health is the most important aspect in our lives that should be taken care of. According to University of California San Francisco Global Health Sciences (2014), in the past decade, there has been an increased interest in public-private partnership relating to healthcare across the world. This is of good news to the public since this kind of partnership has a long-term effect between a nation’s government and a private sector which helps aid in the welfare of the public and for this be incorporated in the health sector is very helpful. Health is the most important thing to be taken care of and for the government to make a move like this would benefit not only the rich but also those who cannot afford healthcare. On one hand, according to Barrows, MacDonald, Supapol, Dalton-Jez, Harvey-Rioux (2012) who conducted a case study on public-private partnership in Canadian health care, Canada’s healthcare system is primarily a public programme but there are also aspects of care that are delivered privately. This system of theirs has become a problem and a burden at the same time for the government to handle since provincial budgets are at a high in terms of healthcare demands. This prompted the country to adapt the public-private partnership method so as to be able to meet the healthcare demands and to be able to continue their primary goal of the healthcare system which is of the public. On the other hand, New Zealand does not present any public-private partnership with regards to their healthcare system but according to the Medical Council of New Zealand (2011), it has both a public and private working healthcare system which offers high quality of care. The public system is free to all New Zealanders and individuals who are on a work permit visa that is valid for two or more years while the private system offers access to all private facilities for treatment of immediate and non-immediate health conditions. The public system is government funded and works as a community-based model while the private system offers specialist services and primary care at private hospitals. One thing that pans out in New Zealand’s healthcare system is the health insurance they provide. Even though you are not a citizen of the country and you are only here for a vacation or perhaps study purposes, the individual can still be or will be covered by the government’s personal injury scheme insurance known as ACC. The New Zealand judiciary system in itself is independent and has integrity, as stated by the Ministry of Justice, the judiciary’s independence is an important principle to the country’s constitution which leads to freedom from political interference and that members of the House of Representatives cannot criticise a judge. More or less Canada’s judiciary system shows similarities with that of New Zealand’s since it is also independent and shows integrity, as per Forsey (2012), the systems’ independence goes a hundred years back. A judge who makes a decision that the government does not agree with cannot touch him or her. Judiciary independence in Canada is important because the Supreme Court interprets the Constitution and defines the limits of the federal and provincial powers. A system being independent and shows integrity can mean a lot to a country because it entails fairness to all. There will be no abuse and bias in the law and in my educated opinion, this system works well in a healthcare standpoint. With regards to health and security, New Zealand health security to the people is presented in the form of the Social Security Act of 1964 which provides a wide range of medical benefits whether you are an individual who can afford healthcare or not. This act provides a right to free treatment and relief. (McLintock, 2009) In Canada, they have this program called Health Canada which was established to help improve each Canadians health. This program is also an administrator of the Canada Health Act. This program also collaborates with the Privacy Act that gives a person the right to access information about themselves with limited exceptions. This protects an individual’s privacy with regards to health. (Health Canada, 2011) Human rights observed both in New Zealand and Canada are more or less having the same thought. Both countries are giving all their respective citizens equal rights and compensation regardless of race, gender, age, sexual orientation, marital status, family status, and disability. (Justice Laws Website, 2014) In this case discrimination is unlawful and unacceptable. (Human Rights Commission, 2008-2014) Although New Zealand is more diverse than Canada it is still evident that the top priority of both countries is equality. It is important in healthcare that human rights are observed because regardless of where we are from or who we are, we are all human beings. Every nation needs financial assistance or funding, especially in health care, to take care of their people. New Zealand and Canada presents a health care system that takes care of their people by means of health programs that benefit them without getting a single penny from their pockets. Allocated budget for a country depends on the population and the government’s involvement. In 2012/2013 financial year, New Zealand has a $14.65 million allocated budget for health but they the core Crown health spending for the financial year is around $14.5 million. There is also a forecast that the health spending will reach $14.95 million during the 2013/2014 financial year. (The Treasury, 2013) According to Scoop (2013), independent news, the 2013 health budget in New Zealand received the largest increase making available $1.6 billion for health over four years which has an average of $352 million of funds per year. C. COMPETITION Meanwhile, Chai of Global News (2013) reported that Canada will acquire a bill of $211 billion by the end of 2013 on health care alone. The Canadian Institute for Health Information broke down the amount to around $5,988 per individual in health care costs. The amount is not staggering compared to the past decade since for the year 2013 it is only a 2.6 per cent increase in health care spending while the past decade recorded a seven per cent increase per year in health care expense. Although health expense has been increasing in Canada every year, it has toned down a bit for the year 2013 as to the previous years. To furthermore break down on where the amount was spent, 30 per cent was spent on hospitals, 16 per cent was spent on medications and 15 per cent was spent on physicians. Majority, around 70 per cent, of health care spending in Canada is covered by the provincial government. A report by May (2014) from the National Post stated that the public servants’ benefits, to mention sick leaves, will be cut off in order to save billions for the 2014 budget. VI. REFERENCE LIST/BIBLIOGRAPHY Barrows, MacDonald, et al. (2012), â€Å"Public-private partnerships in Canadian health care: A case study of the Brampton Civic Hospital†, OECD Journal on Budgeting, Vol. 12/1, p. 3. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/gov/budgeting/PPP%20Canadian%20healthcare.pdf Chai, C. (29/10/2013). Global News; By the numbers: How much did Canada spend on health care in 2013? Retrieved from http://globalnews.ca/news/932105/by-the-numbers-how-much-did-canada-spend-on-health-care-in-2013/ Forsey, E. (2012). Parliament of Canada: How Canadians Govern Themselves Chapter 5 (5.2). Retrieved from http://www.parl.gc.ca/about/parliament/senatoreugeneforsey/book/chapter_5-e.html Health Canada. (2011). Health Canada Privacy Act Annual Report 2010-2011. Retrieved from http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ahc-asc/pubs/_atip-aiprp/2011priv-prot/index-eng.php Human Rights Commission. (2008-2014). Human Rights Act. Retrieved from http://www.hrc.co.nz/human-rights-environment/human-rights-legislation/human-rights-act/ Justice Laws Website. (28/03/2014). Canadian Human Rights Act. Retrieved from http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/h-6/page-1.html#h-1 LexisNexis. (2014). Rule of Law. Retrieved from http://www.lexisnexis.ca/en-ca/about-us/rule-of-law.page May, C. (11/02/2014). National Post: Canada budget 2014 looks to slash public servant’s benefits in effort to save billions. Retrieved from http://news.nationalpost.com/2014/02/11/canada-budget-2014-looks-to-slash-public-servants-benefits-in-effort-to-save-billions/ McLintock, A. (updated 22/04/2009). The Encyclopedia of New Zealand: Health Benefits. Originally published in 1966. Retrieved from http://www.teara.govt.nz/en/1966/social-security/page-6 Medical Council of New Zealand. (2011). Public and Private Health Systems. Retrieved from https://www.mcnz.org.nz/alpinfo/public-and-private-health-systems Ministry of Justice. The New Zealand Legal System. Retrieved from http://www.justice.govt.nz/publications/global-publications/t/the-new-zealand-legal-system Scoop Independent News. (16/05/2013). Health receives the largest Budget increase. Retrieved from http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA1305/S00296/health-receives-the-largest-budget-increase.htm The Treasury. (07/10/2013). Health: Funding. Retrieved from http://www.treasury.govt.nz/government/expenditure/health University of California, San Francisco, Global Health Sciences. (2014). The Global Health Groups: Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs). Retrieved from http://globalhealthsciences.ucsf.edu/global-health-group/private-sector-healthcare-initiative-pshi/research/public-private-partnerships

Friday, January 17, 2020

When Consultants and Clients Clash

When consultants and client clash: Problem Essay Statlers have failed to get their clients to acknowledge the differences in thinking about the merger. The rationale behind every merger is that the sum is greater than the parts. Typically, clients identify synergies for the merger and from then on consultants suggest the decisions necessary for attaining them. The synergy cited in this case, economies of scale, is only possible if the two firms worked together as a single unit.Susan Barlow ¶s lack of experience in conducting with clients and failure to understand the need for merger coupled with Kellogg ¶s ineptness in handling sticky situations has led to the current state. Susan, in her initial briefing with Mr. Kellogg, started off on a wrong note. First, she patronized the entrepreneur-turned-CEO, accepted his list of interviewees and even agreed to his deadlines. If she was any experienced, she would have been more pro-active, played the role of a devil ¶s advocate to expl ore other views about merger and understand its need.More importantly, as John Rau suggests, she would have done independent fact finding which would give her an idea about who to talk to. Another important task she missed out was talking to Mr. Carpenter and exploring his views about the merger. If she had any knowledge about mergers she would have replied to Mr. Kellogg ¶s remarks on mergers and explained to him that acquisitions have far higher success rates than  µmergers of equals ¶. All these point to her lack of expertise in mergers and inexperience with conducting with clients. Royce Kellogg acknowledges how he always relied on Mort Meyer to deal with people problems.Further, his naive view of the merger, which is so far only an agreement between two heads, reinforces his skewed understanding of the problem. In response to numerous calls from employees, who had already been given heads-up, Kellogg was quick in drawing conclusion that consultants are stirring up trouble rather than understand the underlying causes. Mr. Kellogg ¶s belief that derivatives are harder than the assignment Susan is currently dealing with shows how little interest he has in organizational issues and understanding their importance.With only Mort ¶s death triggering the merger, it was pretty thin to start with. For two firms with almost equal share operating on similar lines of business, the only value that could be derived out of merger is to cut the costs through staff reductions and higher scale of operations. To realize this, one of the firms needed to be an underdog and everybody, including the consultants missed this entirely. Kellogg spoke about mergers of equals without realizing how dangerous it was. This evidence strongly suggests the desperate need for mergers and acquisitions expert.Hence, any corrective measure should start with bringing in an expert on mergers into the team. Statler should start with a fresh slate by bringing in a new team to work on the project and let go of the costs for the initial two weeks. This will also greatly alleviate Kellogg ¶s anger and frustration with the consultants. The new policies that should govern the Kellogg Champion should be centered on cutting costs and achieving a merit-based organization structure rather than keeping a set of policies and disregarding the other.

Thursday, January 9, 2020

Sociology Research Paper Example

A sociology research paper example has been designed for the sake of creating the general insight of the model paper for a sociology topic. This sample may serve as a useful guide to everyone who wants to try himself/herself in the research area. Sometimes, the process of writing a research paper is a challenge for writers who have not done similar studies before or have the lack of knowledge how a sociology research paper needs to be laid out. For that reason, a sociology research paper example will represent a standard format of the research paper written according to stylistic norms and omitting hidden pitfalls. Afterward, the reader will have the opportunity to observe different writing techniques that help to create an effective, easy flowing, and interesting sociology research paper, which tests the hypotheses along with predictions from one’s theory and built upon the others’ findings. Social Inequality Introduction Today, American society faces many social inequalities based on social control along with stratification, race, and gender. Although there is a broad range of social inequalities, gender discrimination is the biggest issue among the others. This type of discrimination takes place in the working area, sports, and in media. By the way, it is hard to overcome this social issue that has been put upon men and women without getting acquainted with the difference between the term of equality and inequality. Statement of Problem Hypotheses Development The current sociology research aims to benefit the public. In particular, the study depends on the social problems occurring in an American community. Different aspects of sociological theories will contribute to the new way of sociology development and inspiring society. The core purpose of this research paper is to determine the main difference between identity and social inequality problem which is continually growing in the USA. From theoretical formulation, the central hypothesis states that there are many differences between social inequality and equality; however, both terms do not differ by the opposite meanings. Methods This research paper represents a conceptual view. Findings According to the findings, inequality is not the opposite term to the term equality. The reason of such concluding remark is because all people are different. The study identifies the equality as a zero point of the total range of inequality. Further, the findings underline that socially recognized differences provoke the existence of absolute. According to the results of the study, there are nine different inequality bases; hence, equality is just the balance of all inequalities. Discussion Actually, it is not that simple to define the total equality. By contrast, the complexity of inequalities affects the recognition of the total equality. In this insight, the zero point of the term inequality is in some way unattainable. On the other hand, the real problem could be related to the real extent of existed inequality that should be reduced. Conclusion All things considered, social inequality is the real issue of the modern US community. In addition, the terms of equality and inequality are different but not opposite. For that reason, the rise of equality does not mean the automatic growth of mobility.

Wednesday, January 1, 2020

Outline and Assess Feminist Views of Crme and Deviance.

Outline and assess Feminist views on crime and deviance. (50) Within Feminism itself there are many different approaches to crime and deviance including Liberalism, Radicalism and Post-modernism. Each of them believes that crime, or the lack of crime, is a result of the patriarchal dominance in society. Feminists believe that the patriarchy generates crime against women whilst discouraging deviancy amongst women. The official crime statistics show that men tend to commit more crime than women, and some Feminists would agree with this. One theory put forward is that this is because of the differential socialisation of males and females. Oakley argues that males are socialised to be aggressive, self-seeking and individualistic, which†¦show more content†¦A major criticism is that most female criminals are working class and they have not been hit by women’s liberation. This can be explained in detail by Carlen. Carlen adopts Hirschi’s control theory when explaining crime, which assumes that humans are essentially rational and they will turn to crime when the advantages seem to outweigh the disadvantages and are more appealing than the likely rewards of conformity. Carlen argues that the working-class background is fairly typical of female offenders convicted of more serious crimes. According to Carlen, working class women have been controlled through the promise of rewards stemming from the workplace and the family. She identified the ‘class deal’, which offers a decent standard of living for women who work, and the ‘gender deal’, which offers material and emotional rewards to women who conform to conventional domestic gender roles. In terms of the class deal, the women in Carlen’s study failed to find a legitimate way of earning a decent living. In terms of the gender deal, some had been abused by partners/fathers. They had gained nothing from either deal and so felt they had nothing to lose by using crime to escape from poverty. This idea of a rational calculation of the advantages and disadvantages of crime runs parallel with the Rational Choice Theory offered to us by